Archive for March, 2009

Lies, Lies, Lies

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

No, I’m not talking about the latest talk by Barack Obama regarding Earmark Reform, as he signs a bill with over 8000 Earmarks, INCLUDING SOME OF HIS OWN!!!

The media, and particularly Arabs and Muslims, are lying to you.

If you want to see a very concise history of the Middle East, the short film below is EXCELLENT. Everyone should watch this, and memorize it.

If you want to know the REAL TRUTH about what is going on in the Middle East, and particularly Israel, WATCH THIS FILM!!!

http://www.terrorismawareness.org/what-really-happened/

No More Risks For “Peace”

Sunday, March 8th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

NO MORE RISKS FOR “PEACE”!  

 
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” 
(Albert Einstein)
 
Well did the Psalmist express the anguish being felt by many Israeli men and women today:
 
“In my distress I cried to the Lord, and He heard me. Deliver my soul, O Lord, from lying lips and from a deceitful tongue. What shall be given to you, or what shall be done to you, you false tongue? Sharp arrows of the warrior, with coals of the broom tree! 
Woe is me, that I dwell in Meshech, that I dwell among the tents of Kedar! My soul has dwelt too long with one who hates peace. I am for peace; but when I speak, they are for war.”
   (Psalm 120)
 
‘I am for peace; but when I speak, they are for war.’
 
As Israeli politicians and commentators increasingly voice in public these days: ‘We have no real peace partners.’ Even Abu Mazen – the world’s hope for ‘peace’ with Israel – has no power over his own Palestinian Arabs, and thus is certainly in no position to make peace with Israel, however much money and political assistance the West and even Israel are willing to undergird him with as their last hope for a deal with the Jewish state.
 
Despite all this, the Western powers – claiming always to have tiny Israel’s best interests at heart – advise, cajole and pressure this nation continually, in a monotonous refrain, to “take risks for ‘peace.’”
 
Well – Israel has been doing this since the 1993 signing of the OSLO accord – when they trusted a pathological liar and ruthless terrorist Yasser Arafat, and his gang, to make real peace with them. They gave him weapons, autonomy and political acceptance throughout the world, resulting in him even being crowned with the fabulous Nobel Prize for peace!
 
And it all came to nothing. No, less than nothing. True to his nature, Arafat used the guns and weaponry granted him by deceived and gullible Israeli leaders to continue his war against the Jews, and many Israelis were massacred by the very guns he received in OSLO.
 
The territory in which Arafat was allowed to enjoy autonomy was transformed into training camps for terrorists and a safe haven for “suicide” bomb-makers, who shredded Jewish by the hundreds in buses, discos, coffee shops, hotels and pizzerias.
 
Nevertheless – this sick and often anti-Semitic world did not so much as berate Arafat for totally failing to keep his promises to Israel, instead pestering Israel with more requests as if nothing had happened. Ignoring the glaringly obvious, it kept sounding its tattered refrain: Israel must take more risks for peace.
 
And so, under the persistent pressure and prodding of the world – Israel decided to take more risks, withdrawing first from Southern Lebanon – which Israel accurately called its security zone – and afterwards withdrawing 100 percent from the Gaza Strip. The risks were in vain; the gambles lost: Not only did the withdrawals fail to secure peace, they increased exponentially the ability and the resolve of the terrorists to attack: thousands of Katyushas falling on the civilian population in Northern Israel and thousands of Kassam and Grad rockets on Israel’s southern civilians.
 
Lebanon and Gaza, as a result of “these risks for peace,” are now in the hands of the ruthless terrorist organizations Hizbollah and Hamas.
 
When – yes when – will there finally arise a strong and courageous Israel leadership who will dare take a stand against this increasingly cowardly and hypocritical world and say to them, ‘Enough is enough?’
 
If there is one nation that has taken risks for peace, more than any other nation would have done, and more than was justified for her already battered and disappointed people, it is Israel. Don’t you ever dare to come to us again with your worn out and counterproductive “please take risks for peace – we are your friends.” We did it and it brought us endless terror and the deaths of our beloved people. 
 
Thank you very much, but we are through with your destructive advice for ‘our peace!’
 
Jan Willem van der Hoeven, Director
International Christian Zionist Center

Keep Jerusalem United

Thursday, March 5th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

 

Dear Friend of Jerusalem,

For decades, Arabs have gotten a free pass when it comes to Israel’s real estate laws. While everyone else is required to get permits before building in Jerusalem and elsewhere, Arabs build illegally in Jerusalem and throughout the State of Israel. Until now, Israeli politicians shied away from upholding the law when it comes to Arabs. 

Now that Israel’s political leaders have decided to enforce the law of the land Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has accused Israel of breaking some unspecifiedhillary_clinton_and_abbas-thumb-275x236 international obligations, by deciding to demolish some illegally constructed homes. Clinton told the press she intends to raise this issue with Israel’s leaders. Interestingly, Clinton did not protest when the State of Israel forcefully ejected thousands of Jews from their homes in Gaza.

This recent move by Clinton clearly places her in the camp that favors the Arabs taking Jerusalem as their capital. Clinton is obviously not bothered by the facts that under Israeli rule Jerusalem has been a free and open city to all people. Such freedom never existed when the city was divided, and Jews were driven out of the Old City.

Nor is Clinton bothered by the prospect of Islamic terrorists setting up advanced bases of terror in Jerusalem. Under such conditions, Jerusalem would become inaccessible to Jews and Christians alike. Just look what happened in Gaza.

By drawing the line in the sand over Jerusalem, Clinton has chosen to have a contentious relationship with the incoming Netanyahu Administration. Fortunately, Netanyahu has pledged not to give up Jerusalem. And so have we.

OneJerusalem.com